_/_/_/ 元デブオタ君の恋愛日記 (仕事ネタ編) _/_/_/

仕事/転職ネタを中心に、ブログを分離しました。

英検1級 二次試験 -3-

Agree or Disagree: Should an authority proactively arrest a suspect?

 

I regard apprehending as a punishment, even though the arrest is for the purpose of custody of a suspect and the suspect is not guilty (=innocent).

 

The suspect may be indicted (=charged) by a prosecutor, and then the suspect will be called as a defendant / an accused in a civil / criminal trial.

 

The suspect is not a culprit until the Supreme Court sentences to a penalty including a suspended sentence.

 

However, the behavior of capture will be allegedly reported in public with real name, and the suspect will be in handcuffs. It is so humiliating.

 

The defendant may appeal the sentence, but the court tends to uphold, the allegation will be dismissed.

 

Therefore, I definitely believe that an authority should not easily arrest a suspect.

 

  • custody: 拘留
  • indict: 起訴する
  • prosecutor: 検察
  • a suspended sentence: 執行猶予
  • allegedly: (真偽は別として)伝えられるところによると
  • appeal: 控訴する
  • uphold: 判決を支持する
  • allegation: 申し立て

 Suspect → Defendant → Culprit (≒ Criminal)